Do Not Sell My Personal Information

La Salle Professor Reveals Reasons Why Accepting the 25% Shading Threshold Will Benefit Only Election Cheaters


Veteran political science expert and La Salle Professor Antonio Contreras revealed the reasons why the COMELEC's decision to allow the 25% shading threshold as official votes to be counted will only benefits those people who are election cheaters.


According to Prof. Antonio Contreras automation begs us to be stricter on shading threshold to ensure tha na accidental blot of a pen will not be interpreted as a vote, but the COMELEC's decision to heed the call of VP Leni's camp to count the votes with just 25% shade is indeed questionable.

The veteran political analyst noted that the massive information and educating campaign instructing voters to shade fully, is therefore inconceivable if they opt for the 25% minimum shading threshold, when such would be open to accidental reading of marks that are not intended as votes, and would negate and put to waste the information drive worth millions of taxpayer's money.



Prof. Contreras also added that only a cheating mind would do so, accepting the 25% shading threshold despite the millions of pesos spent in massive information drive by the COMELEC.

Here's the Complete Expose of Prof. Antonio Contreras:

Automation begs us to be stricter on shading threshold to ensure that an accidental blot of a pen will not be interpreted as a vote. To prevent disenfranchisement of people who will have the tendency to lazily shade, COMELEC presumably embarked on a massive information and education campaign instructing voters to shade fully.

Thus, it is therefore inconceivable that the COMELEC should opt for 25% minimum shading threshold when such would be open to accidental reading of marks that are not intended as votes, and would negate and put to waste efforts to educate voters to shade fully.

Only a cheating mind would do so.

Only someone with the intent of revealing to a possible cheating client the information that dots mass-manufactured on pre-shaded ballots will still be read by the machines as valid votes because they are programmed to do so. After all, it is easier and faster to repetitively mark ballots on a wholesale manner with dots than shade them fully.

#ImpeachComelec!



The reason given by COMELEC why it adopted a minimum threshold of 25 percent is to ensure that "no accidental or unintended small marks are counted as votes in order to reflect the true intent of the voter."

This is idiotic.

The more that accidental or unintended small marks will be counted as valid votes when you have smaller or lower thresholds. What would prevent such is to have higher thresholds since it will ensure that dots and unintended marks will not be read by the VCM as valid votes.

Ang tatanga! As in!

#ImpeachComelec!

Source: Prof. Antonio Contreras FB Page


La Salle Professor Reveals Reasons Why Accepting the 25% Shading Threshold Will Benefit Only Election Cheaters La Salle Professor Reveals Reasons Why Accepting the 25% Shading Threshold Will Benefit Only Election Cheaters Reviewed by Phil Newsome on 7/27/2018 Rating: 5

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.