Jay Sonza Asks "Mayroon Bang Dapat Ipagyabang sa Panalo ng Pilipinas sa Permanent Arbitral Court"


Veteran journalist and political analyst Jay Sonza asked his followers on social media whether they could provide some reasons to celebrate or to be proud of the country's alleged victory of the Philippines in the Permanent Arbitral Court at The Hague.


Jay Sonza enumerated some of the reasons why we should not consider the Hague rulings as victory for the Philippines because the Chinese government did not abide with the rulings because they don't recognize the jurisdiction of the PCA over China.



China did not participate in any proceedings which that costs the Philippines with at $7 million in expenses to pay for the international lawyers who are fighting against an invisible enemy at The Hague. The Philippines paid for the filing fees including the payment which was supposed to be shouldered by China.

In short according to Jay Sonza, the Philippines, effectively  bought a ruling but the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) could not be implemented unless China would agree with the decision. The decision could not be brought to UN Security Council for implementation because, China had veto power together with Russia and the USA.

Read the Complete Explanations of Jay Sonza:

mayroon bang dapat ipagyabang o ipagbunyi o ipagmalaki sa panalo ng pilipinas sa Permanente Arbitral Court sa The Hague?



1. inihabla nga ang tsina, pero dinedma lang ito.
1.a. hindi kinilala ng china ang jurisdiction o saklaw ng PCA
1.b. hindi nakibahagi sa alinmang proceedings ang china.

2. gumastos ang ating bansa ng $7 milyon para sa mga dayuhang abogado na wala namang katunggali sa korte.

3. at dahil hindi nga lumahok ang china, pilipinas ang nagbayad ng buong filing fees, kasama na ang dapat bayaran ng kabilang panig (China). sa madaling salita gumastos tayo ng milyones dolyares para bilhin ang bilasang desisyon na pumabor sa Pilipinas. in short, we effectively bought a ruling.

4. ang desisyon ng PCA (permanent court of arbitration) ay hindi maaring ipatupad kung hindi papayag ang tsina.



5. walang maaring puwersahang magpatupad ng ruling dahil wala namang pulis o sundalong maaring mag implement nito.

6. kapag dinala naman ito sa UN security council, may veto power ang china at ang kaalyado nitong russia, tulad ng amerika.

7. ang isinulong nina Carpio, Batongbakal, Hilbay ay "traditonal fishing ground" (nakasanayan mangisda ang mga pinoy doon) ang kalboro o bajo de Masinloc.

8. mayroon bang saysay ang ipinagmamalaking tagumpay? tagumpay saan?


Source: Jay Sonza FB Page


Jay Sonza Asks "Mayroon Bang Dapat Ipagyabang sa Panalo ng Pilipinas sa Permanent Arbitral Court" Jay Sonza Asks "Mayroon Bang Dapat Ipagyabang sa Panalo ng Pilipinas sa Permanent Arbitral Court" Reviewed by Phil Newsome on 7/02/2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.